Create Desktop Shortcut

Download FREE Ebook & Win Our Monthly Drawing

Malignant brain tumors are now the leading cause of death among children...

"Cell Phones and other Sources of
EMF Endanger Your Children --
Here's How You Can Protect Them..."



octor George Carlo, former Chief Scientist of the world's largest research effort into wireless safety, was hired by the cellular phone industry to prove that cell phones are safe -- HE COULDN'T!

“One by one, alarming signs appeared in Dr. Carlo’s research: that cell phones interfere with pacemakers, that developing skulls of children are penetrated deeply by the energy emitted from a cell phone, that the blood brain barrier which prevents invasion of the brain by toxins can be compromised by the cell phone radiation, and most startling, that radio frequency radiation creates micronuclei in human blood cells, a type of genetic damage known to be a diagnostic marker for cancer.”
~ from Cell Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age by Dr. George Carlo and Martin Schram


Brain on Drugs? NO! These are brain pictures
of your kids while they talk on their cell phones!

Children are more susceptible to genetic damage because the tissues in their brains and bodies are still growing and their cells are rapidly dividing. Damage to the genetic material in growing cells can lead to disruption of cellular function, cell death, the development of tumors, and damage to the immune and nervous systems. Further, the protective systems that allow for adaptation to environmental insults of all types are not fully developed in children. In the brain, for example, these systems develop and grow until a person is in his or her early 20s.

The higher susceptibility of children and teenagers to the types of health risks that the radio wave scientific data are now showing, coupled with the significantly higher penetration of radio wave radiation into children's heads, brains, and eyes calls for immediate action to protect children.

A recent survey conducted in the UK shows that 87 percent of 11- to 16-year-olds own mobile phones, and that 40 percent of them spend 15 minutes or more each day talking on their cell phones. Even more disturbing, 70 percent of these children said they would not change their cell phone use even if advised to by the Government. It's predicted that by the year 2006 there will be over 2 billion cell phone users in the world – 500 million of them will be children.

As our technology advances and EMF pollution from multiple sources increases, we must be alert to the growing threat to our children of EMF exposure...

The long-term effects of damage inflicted today
won't be known for years to come!

The harmful effects of exposure to EMF accumulate over time. The health cases that came to light in the 1990s most likely had their origin in the 1980s or before. The EMF problem has been categorized as a new form of pollution as consequential as air and water pollution. It has also been likened to the hazards of asbestos and cigarette smoking. In terms of its snowballing health effects, it's been compared to the slow process of lead poisoning.


"The voluntary exposure of the brain to microwaves from hand-held mobile phones" is "the largest human biological
experiment ever"

~ Professor Leif Salford, Head of Research
at Lund University, Sweden

But we need not look too far into the future to see what the consequences are of exposing our children to this harmful radiation right now. According to a statistic provided by NeurologyChannel.com, "Malignant brain tumors are the second leading cause of death in children [under age 15] and young adults [under the age of 34]". In Australia, they're the NUMBER ONE. And experts are suggesting a connection with increased EMF radiation exposure from the use of cell phones.

Just take a look at the following published reports and you will agree that we can't afford to wait much longer before we take any action--

 

A Look at Today's Headlines

An earnest look at the news headlines of recent years will show that this is more than just a 'public scare'. There has been an abundance of media coverage on the hazards of EMF waves and cell phones. Below is just a sampling of media reports that specifically address the issue of EMF exposure on children:


Increase in Childhood Brain Cancers Linked with Cell Phone Use
Reported by Ray Martin
" A Current Affair" - Australia
July 7, 2004

A surprising story on "A Current Affair" TV episode had a prominent (and brave) Australian neurosurgeon actually admitting on national TV that an alarming increase in children's brain cancers may be connected with mobile phone use (and exposure to other sources of EMF).

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

What Cell Phones Can Do To A Youngster's Brain In 2 Minutes
U.K. Sunday Mirror
April 1, 2004

Scientists have discovered that a call lasting just two minutes can alter the natural electrical activity of a child's brain for up to an hour afterwards...

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

RF radiation linked to Autism in children
Research Study
Robert C. Kane, Ph.D.,
February 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

U.K. Gov. Bans Cell Phones in all schools
The Sun, UK Press
November 16, 2003

TEACHERS have been ordered to ban their pupils from using their mobile phones amid rising safety fears.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Cell Phones Could Make Teens Go Senile Early
The Independent
Geoffrey Lean, Environment Editor
14 September 2003

Mobile phones and the new wireless technology could cause a "whole generation" of today's teenagers to go senile in the prime of their lives.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mouth Cancer and Mobile Phone Use by Children
PowerWatch
Novemeber 17, 2004

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Teen Cell Phone Radiation Risk
CPRNews Bureau
April 04, 2003

Mobile phone manufacturers should take seriously a Swedish finding that their products are dangerous for teenagers and work on developing safer phones, says scientist Dr Neil Cherry.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"Mobile Phones Killed My Daughter"
John Coles
THE TIMES
August 28, 2002

A distraught mum blamed the death of her "chatterbox" teenage daughter on radiation from a mobile phone.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Unborn Children Damaged by Cell Phone Use
Citizens Initiative Omega
August 22, 2002

The cell phone headset has become popular as a way to reduce the cognitive impairment and cancer risk associated with radiofrequency (RF) radiation exposure. However, the possibility of embryonic and fetal damage is now increasing as the radiating cell phone units are being moved elsewhere on or near the body.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Top Scientists Damns Companies for Targeting the Young and Putting Their Health at Risk
Daily Mail, London
January 26, 2002

Mobile phone firms are cynically targeting children despite fears they are most at risk from radiation, a leading scientist claimed.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EMF and Childhood Leukemia Risk
Microwave News
September/October 2000

 

Can You See that We Can't Afford to Wait Any Longer?
Our Future Generations are at Risk!

What Do Your Kids Want to be When They Grow Up?
EMF Radiation Causes Genetic Damage
and Impairs Learning Ability!

Published research continues to reinforce the understanding that human exposure to radio frequency radiation can cause damaging genetic effects including chromosome damage, DNA damage, cancer, memory loss, and cognitive impairment. Doctors fear that disturbed brain activity in children due to EMF penetration of the brain could lead to psychiatric and behavioral problems or impaired learning ability.

"Recent studies involving short-term exposures have demonstrated that subtle effects on brain functions can be produced by low-intensity pulse modulated radiofrequency (RF) radiation. Some research involving rodents has shown adverse effects on short-term and long-term memory. The concern is that if such effects may occur in young children, then even slight impairment of learning ability over years of education may negatively affect the quality of life that could be achieved by these individuals, when adults."
- Norbert Hankin, Environmental Scientist, EPA's Office of Radiation & Indoor Air, April 26, 2000

So if cell phones are so dangerous,
why are they still around?

The majority of research findings, as we have mentioned here, indicate there is significant risk. However, the wireless industry refute these studies with their own and have even begun marketing towards children. And the government, for the most part, is silent and waiting for more conclusive body of evidence that could take years to build.

What do the majority of existing studies say? About 56 percent of the 308 studies (both industry-funded and independent) involving cell-phone radiation have shown biological effects. To be fair, I haven't mentioned any of the other 44 percent that show no such effect. However, many of these studies were funded by the cellphone industry. If you take into account only the non-industry funded studies, a much higher number, 68 percent, show that cell phone radiation causes biological effects.

Remember, according to findings from the 6-year $28 million research funded by the industry itself and headed by Dr. George Carlo, there is significant cause for alarm. His findings have been confirmed by recent European studies.

These studies have shown such biological effects as damage to DNA, changes in brain electrical activity, breakdown in the blood-brain barrier and others mentioned on this page. Biological effects don't necessarily lead to health impacts. This is because the body's immune system has repair mechanisms to overcome them. This is one reason for the difficulty among governments and experts around the world in establishing exposure safety standards. Some people will be more susceptible than others, and it is an enormous task to determine how much exposure to consider safe when dealing with varying susceptibilities among the population. However...

One thing is becoming clear: A one time exposure might not be of much consequence. But with cumulative stress resulting from repeated exposures, the repair process might break down.

Scientists are concerned that subtle changes in our bodies triggered by long-term cellphone use could be precursors to serious problems such as headaches, cancer, benign tumors, early onset of Alzheimer's and reduced fertility--potential health risks that could prove decades to prove or disprove.

If the previous environmental issues involving tobacco, asbestos, and lead are any indication, it takes years and even decades to accumulate the amount of evidence that would produce a government decision. In the case of cigarette smoking, it took two decades of study and 100 years of consumer use to gather enough data to meet research standards to demonstrate the need for the U.S. Surgeon General's warning label on cigarette packs. Some experts say that in the case of cell phones, it will not take that long as data are coming in at a faster pace. But at the present the authorities can only urge people to exercise caution.

Dr. George Carlo says that by 2010, the epidemic curve projections indicate 500,000 cases of brain and eye cancer each year attributable to cell phone use. Do we really want to wait and see if that holds true? According to WHO report, 0.1 billion people have died from tobacco use in the 20th century, and 10 times as many will die in the 21st century. No one is suggesting that using cell phones could lead to as many casualties, but do we really want to wait and find out what that number would be?


(Scroll to the right to view the rest of the chart.)

 

Meanwhile, what do you do?--

Do you really want to wait until the rest of the world admits cell phones are damaging your health? By that time, it might be too late. Here are a few simple
things you can do right now--

Dr. George Carlo, now head of the non-profit Science and Public Policy Institute, outlines in his Safe Wireless Initiative program three means or layers of intervention that you can do right now to help you and your family minimize the health risks associated with EMF radiation.

Primary means of intervention include avoidance measures.
Secondary means of intervention include measures to minimize effect of radiation on biofield.
Tertiary means of intervention include lifestyle measures that enhance general wellness and health.

Here are some of our suggestions based on this multi-layered approach to intervetion:


I. Primary Intervention:
Avoidance measures

  • Limit use to essential calls.
  • Keep calls short.
  • Wear an airtube headset and keep the cell phone away from your body.
  • If using the phone without a headset, wait for the call to connect before placing the phone next to the ear.
  • Use text messaging.
  • Do not use the cell phone in enclosed metal spaces such as vehicles or elevators, where devices may use more power to establish connection.
  • Do not make a call when the signal strenght is one bar or less, which means the phone must work harder to establish a connection.
  • Avoid using belt clips, holster or similar accessories made of metallic components.
  • Purchase a phone with a low SAR (Specific Absorption Rate). Most phones have a SAR level listed in its instruction manual. The SAR level is a way of measuring the quantity of radiofrequency (RF) energy that is absorbed by the body. The lower number the better. (Be aware, however, that studies with RF hundreds of times lower than current SAR limits still show biological effects.)

These measures do not completely eliminate, but only minimize, exposure to EMF that you can control. Even if you're not using a cell phone, you are still subject to 'second hand' radiation from other people in your vicinity using THEIR cell phones! And it is not only RF/microwave frequencies from cell phones and cordless phones that you need to be concerned about. Studies are showing that EMFs emitted by TVs, computers, household appliances, office equipment, household wiring cause biological effects and contribute to growing stress in people's lives. It is next to impossible, and even impractical, to avoid daily EMF exposure!

Before we talk about the secondary means of intervention, let's go ahead and describe the tertiary measures...


III. Tertiary intervention:
Lifestyle activities and choices that enhance wellness

This could simply include things such as spending time in nature, eating a healthy diet, taking nutritional supplements (including powerful antioxidants to combat free radical damage), physical exercise, qi gong and other practices that strengthen the bioenergetic field and immune system, etc. The stronger your immune system, the more quickly and efficiently your biological repair mechanisms are able to overcome any EMF-induced stress, or any stress for that matter.

Now, let's get back to the secondary, and very important, means of dealing with EMF exposure--


II. Secondary intervention:
Devices that protect or strengthen the human
Biofield against effects of EMF radiation

The human biofield, or bioenergetic field that emanates from the human body, is a matrix of subtle electromagnetic waves that connect cells, tissues and organs and serves as the main communication network and regulator of life processes. External stressors such as EMF cause stress on the biofield that with repeated exposure could lead to the disruption of these biological processes.

One of the most effective tools for strengthening the
biofield against EMF-induced stress is the Q-Link®.

The Q-Link® has been substantiated by over a decade of research showing its ability to efficiently resonate life-supporting frequencies in the biofield and enable a powerful response to stress. Most people immediately notice heightened energy and a quick return to homeostatic balance. Since cell phones are not our only source of EMFs, it's next to impossible to avoid EMF exposure. Simple avoidance measures are not sufficient and, in most cases, not practical. This makes tools like the Q-Link®, which you can wear 24 hours a day everywhere you go, a becoming necessity.

Here's one study that shows how the QLink's SRT reduces the effects of cell phone radiation on the human brain:

With our daily EMF exposure growing exponentially with no end in sight, it is becoming more and more imperative to protect yourself from these energy drains and function optimally the way you need to function. Q-Link® delivers--GUARANTEED!

Click here to learn how Q-Link® works
and why you need one right now for
yourself and your family

Click here to order now


 

 

We hope we made the point clear that using your cell phone without protection may be risking your health. Don't wait. Protect yourself and your family now. Don't risk another phone call with a microwave next to your head. And whatever you do, don't let your children use a cell phone – UNTIL you've taken steps to reduce their risks. Don't wait – ACT NOW!

 

 

Wishing you and your family well,
Taraka Serrano

Join Our Campaign to Protect the Children
--and Adults Too!


P.S. Please let everyone you know of the dangers of EMF waves. Do you know of any friend, co-worker, neighbor, etc. who uses the cell phone, cordless phone, computers, etc.? .

 

 

Note: The contents of this website are the sole responsibility of the website owner and do not necessarily reflect the views of the sources cited or resources recommended on this website. They are for informational and educational purposes only and are not meant to be construed as medical or legal advice.

___________________________________________________________________

Copyright ©2004- All rights reserved.
Lotus Pond Press LLC is an independent
distributor for Q-Link® products.
email: