EMF Protection Solutions

Alzheimer's and EMF Connection?

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:08:00 +0000

A Switzerland University study reported a month ago that people living within 50 meters (about 50 yards) of a high-voltage power line were more likely to die with Alzheimer's disease. After 15 years of living near a 220-380 kV power line, the odds of dying with Alzheimer's were double the expected rate, according to the report.

This is not the first study making the connection between Alzheimer's and EMF exposure. Back in 1994, a joint U.S.–Finnish team has linked occupational EMF exposures to the disease, and the association appears to be quite strong. In a paper presented at the 4th International Conference on Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders in Minneapolis, Dr. Eugene Sobel of the University of Southern California (USC) School of Medicine in Los Angeles reported a series of significant relative risks that are, he said, higher than those reported for leukemia and other types of cancer. Seamstresses who use industrial sewing machines appeared to be particularly vulnerable. Dr. Sobel just last year concluded in a review for the Bioinitiative Report that there is "strong epidemiological evidence" that magnetic fields are a risk factor for Alzheimer's disease.

You can read the full Microwave News report on the Power-Line EMFs: New Focus on Alzheimer's Disease.

Boston Red Sox Ace Pitcher Wears the Q-Link

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Tue, 30 Oct 2007 10:17:00 +0000

We were delighted to discover a picture of Red Sox pitcher Josh Beckett wearing a Q-Link pendant: http://papelblog.blogspot.com/2006/08/i-pride-myself-in-reaching-new-lows-of.html

We've also seen him wearing it again and again while pitching during the ALCS series! He's worn it so much, that it has created a lot of buzz around the Q-Link. More articles are being written all the time. Here's one from the Seattle Times:
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/larrystone/2003973386_stone250.html

This comes as no total surprise as athletes find that wearing the Q-Link pendant helps them maintain nerves and focus during high pressure situations. Professional golfers like them, and so do other sports elite.

Dr. George Carlo Explains Mechanism of Harm from RF Radiation

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Wed, 26 Sep 2007 10:45:00 +0000

Dr. George Carlo presents the latest findings that reveal how the information-carrying radio waves from cell phones and other wireless technology are causing biological harm. Dr. Carlo is head of the Safe Wireless Initiative formed to educate the public about the dangers of electromagnetic radiation (EMR). He is also the former chief scientist of the wireless industry's largest safety research project which ended in findings at odds with the industry's agenda.

The video below was taken during his talk to the Irish Doctors Environmental Association (IDEA) in Dublin, Ireland (Feb 2007). Dr. Carlo explains the initial difficulty in finding the correlation between the variety of symptoms experienced by people and wireless radiation, but that the mechanism has now been determined.

In a nutshell, the cells regard the information-carrying radio waves as unrecognizable foreign toxins. This causes the cell membranes to harden and shut down the transport channels between cells. As a result, nutrients don't get in and waste products don't get out. Among these waste products are free radicals that cause disruption of the cellular respiratory function. The cells become further energy-deficient, eventually triggering programmed cell death. The free radicals also interfere with DNA repair, a factor in the development of micronuclei and tumor formation. (Watch the video to get the full flavor.)

Dr. Carlo mentions 3 intervention methods that have been found to counter these effects. These methods target: 1) the cell membrane recognition response, 2) the intercellular communication response, and 3) repair of cellular damage already done. As an example of the first intervention method, he mentions the Molecular Resonance Effect Technology (MRET), a passive noise-field technology that can be used on cell phones. MRET superimposes low frequencies resembling the resonant frequencies of the living cells on the radio waves, making them no longer seen as a foreign invader by the cell membrane. (See BIOPRO Cell Chip for an MRET-powered device.)

But as Dr. Carlo emphasizes, these interventions won't do much unless the background radiation is also eliminated. Thus he advocates the replacement of the wireless infrastructure with fiber optics, for example. This is also one reason why we recommend implementing as many layers of intervetion as possible. Applying Dr. Carlo's 3 intervention methods, you may 1) use the BIOPRO chips with MRET to target the cell membrane protein recognition response, 2) wear the Q-Link pendant to restore and maintain intercellular communications, and 3) take antioxidants to neutralize the free radicals and help reverse any damage that have already been done to the cells.

Here's the video of Dr. Carlo's talk:

More Dr. George Carlo resources...

Electrosensitivity: Is it Real?

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Wed, 19 Sep 2007 09:05:00 +0000

Electrosensitivity is defined as "unhealthy sensitivity (or sensitivities) to a particular source of electricity, for example mobile phones, computers, power lines or even minor electrical equipment. Symptoms are wide-ranging and can include skin problems, headaches, fatigue, fainting, light sensitivity, heart problems and much more. Electrical HyperSensitivity is a name given to those who are severely affected." (Electrosensitivity.org)

While governments and the medical establishment are slow to recognize this condition as real and not merely psychological, there are sufferers around the world whose lives have been devastated because they could not function in our highly technological world. Sunday Express in the UK recently published dramatic stories of such electrosensitive individuals in an article called "Using Wi-fi has Cost Me My Life."

Here at EMF-Health.com we talk to quite a few people with this condition asking us for help. While our flagship product and primary recommendation is always the QLink to help strengthen the biofield from the onslaught of EMF/EMR from all sources, we also suggest multiple layers of protection for maximum protection. The BioPro Cell Chip, for example, has a patented technology that is device-specific and addresses the EMR emitted by cell phones, PDAs and Bluetooth. Another layer we always mention, specifically to help reverse existing cellular damage due to EMR exposure, is the use of antioxidants (particularly SOD, catalase, glutathione, and Coq10). EMR exposure is known to cause buildup of free radicals that have been shown in studies to result in both cellular dysfunction, and in interference with normal DNA repair processes. (See Dr. Gerald Goldberg's book, Would You Put Your Head in a Microwave Oven, for more about nutritional intervention.)

Electromagnetic radiation is not going to go away. In fact, it's only going to get worse. Don't wait to take action only when something has gone wrong. It is always wiser to take a proactive and preventive approach.

Cell Phone Radiation Hidden Dangers

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Thu, 13 Sep 2007 08:40:00 +0000

Life Extension magazine published an excellent in-depth article on "The Hidden Dangers of Cell Phone Radiation." The article looks at why cell phones are dangerous and features Dr. George Carlo, the medical scientist who first headed the multimillion-dollar study on cell phone safety funded by the telecommunications industry. Dr. Carlo's research led to findings that weren't to the industry's liking, and for years has battled to bring the truth about cell phone dangers to the public. Along the way the industry has gone on its way to discredit him and his findings, as well as other scientists in the field.

For example, do you know that the cell phone was allowed to reach the market without pre-market testing? The FDA and other government regulatory agencies were pressured by the communications industry to do so based on the low microwave power of the cell phone. Today DNA damage, brain dysfunction, brain tumors, and other conditions such as sleep disorders and headaches are being linked to cell phone use. And experts such as Dr. Carlo reveal that there may not be any safe level of electromagnetic radiation exposure. Scary, considering there are over two billion cell phone users worldwide daily getting exposed to this danger.

This is a proverbial David vs. Goliath story, as Dr. Carlo tackles the billion-dollar industry head on. Early on, threats to his career, character assassinations, and to top it all, his house mysteriously getting burned down, only made Dr. Carlo more resolved to warn the public. He wrote a book detailing his story and his findings. Based on the book, a number of lawsuits were brought against the industry, and insurance carriers began excluding cell phone-related health risks in their coverage.

Read more of this compelling article here: The Hidden Dangers of Cell Phone Radiation. And if you want to listen/watch more interviews with Dr. Carlo, you can go to this page.

To learn more about a Cell Chip with a patented technology that reduces the effects of cell phone radiation, visit Cellphone-health.com. And for general protection from EMR from all various sources, check out the QLink.

Q-Link: Golf's Secret Weapon?

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Sat, 30 Jun 2007 10:39:00 +0000

The Q-Link pendant, because of its ability to protect the wearer from stress, has become widely popular among golf enthusiasts. Over 300 PGA, LPGA, Champions and European Tour members wear the Q-Link to reduce first tee jitters, reduce stress, control emotions, and lower golf scores. Ernie Els, Justin Rose, Birdie Kim, Lorena Ochoa, Mark Calcavecchia, and numerous others wear the Q-Link to gain an extra edge in their performance. Biomeridian testing using an FDA-registered equipment has shown that the stress level of golfers wearing the Q-Link is dramatically reduced. Numerous wins have been attributed to improved play as a result of wearing the pendant. You can watch unpaid testimonials from some of the golf professionals in our video on this page: Q-Link Golf video.

Cell Phone Tower Near You

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Thu, 14 Jun 2007 10:00:00 +0000

Two studies included in the Institute of Science in Society report (05-24-07) gave clear indications that living close to a cell phone transmitter may lead to increased health risks. A German study found a threefold increase in cancer rates among population living within 400m (about 1300 feet) of a transmitter. And an Israeli study found a fourfold increase for people living within 350m (1148 feet). Women appeared to have been affected the most in both cases.

With the proliferation of the cell phone and wireless technology, it is becoming increasingly difficult to steer clear of the information-carrying radio waves. As previously posted in this blog, you can find out the location of cell phone towers and antennas in your area by visiting antennasearch.com.

The best solution is always a multi-layered approach. You can learn more details about the studies and some suggested intervention solutions in our latest article: Cell Phone Towers: How Far is Safe?

BBC Panorama report on Wi-Fi dangers

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Thu, 07 Jun 2007 09:10:00 +0000

Studies have been made on the health effects of radiation from mobile phones and masts. And there's enough scientific evidence to make Sir William Stewart of the UK, who headed the government's inquiry into the mobile phone mast safety in 2000, to recommend a precautionary approach when siting masts near schools. Sir William is now chairman of the UK Health Protection Agency. His advice was that the beam of greatest intensity from mobile phone masts should not fall on any part of the school grounds.

Although the radiation Wi-Fi emits is similar to that from mobile phone masts, wi-fi is sprouting everywhere. Entire cities are becoming wireless hotspots. In the UK, 70 per cent of secondary schools and 50 per cent of primary schools are using the technology in the classroom. In this Panorama investigation, readings taken in the classroom using Wi-Fi showed the maximum signal strength to be three times higher than the main beam of radiation intensity from a mobile phone mast. This is a great cause for concern because the developing thinner skulls of children have been shown to absorb more radiation than adults.

You can read the full article here. And you can watch the video below.

Dr. George Carlo Rebuts Danish Cell Phone Study

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Sat, 16 Dec 2006 05:14:00 +0000

Dr. George Carlo, former chief scientist of the Wireless Technology Research (WTR) program funded by the wireless industry, dismisses the latest study conducted by a group of scientists in Denmark that shows there is no link between cell phone use and cancer. Dr. Carlo, being an industry insider himself for years, knows the principals involved in the study and where their funding comes from. Dr. Carlo makes strong allegations, but he backs them up with facts and is speaking out in the interest of public health. "Where are Woodward and Bernstein when you need them?" he laments. Read Dr. Carlo's letter now.

Cell Phone Tower & Antenna Locator

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Sun, 19 Nov 2006 10:07:00 +0000

Do you know how many cell phone towers and antennas are near your home? You'd be surprised. Antennasearch.com provides information on existing cell towers, future towers and antennas in your neighborhood. Towers are tall structures (typically over 200 ft) used for cellular, paging and other radio services. Towers can contain multiple antennas owned by various companies. Antennas are the actual signal emitters for cellular, paging and other radio services. Antennas can be placed on towers or be stand alone and placed on top of offices, condos, churches, light poles, signs, etc. Stand alone antennas are small and difficult to spot as they are easily hidden/camouflaged.

In Kihei (Maui, Hawaii) where we live, for example, we found 69 existing towers, 1 future tower, and 351 antennas within 8-mile radius of our home. That's astonishing. But that's nothing compared to city folks in California I know who've reported locating 700 towers around theirs!

Goes to show how much microwave/rf radiation people are getting exposed to nowadays. As one prominent Swedish scientist had said, "This is the largest biological experiment ever." Find out where the cell phone towers and antennas are in your area. Visit Antennasearch.com.

EMF Radiation Can Damage Your Eyes

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Sun, 24 Sep 2006 03:10:00 +0000

Do you use your cell phones and computers a lot? Health experts are finding links between electromagnetic radiation from cell phones and eye problems. A study in Germany in 2001, for example, found a threefold increase in a form of eye cancer called uveal melanoma among cell phone users compared to non-users. Dr. George Carlo, an epidemiologist who headed the cell phone industry's multi-million dollar research into wireless safety, predicts there will be 500,000 cases of brain tumors and eye melanoma by 2010.

Cell phones are not the only ones that can affect visual health. At least one expert (Dr. Gerald Goldberg, MD) points a finger at the massive communications satellite technology for the rising incidence of eye and other health problems in the general population. Sitting in front of the computer for hours probably woulnd't help either, especially for a person wearing wire-rimmed eyeglasses (this writer partly attributes the early development of his cataracts and vitreous detachment to this very cause).

More studies are needed, for sure. But you need not wait until then before doing anything. Here is an article that outlines a few of the findings and some things you can do right now to help preserve your visual health in the midst of electromagnetic onslaught: Electromagnetic Field (EMF) Radiation and Your Eyes

Cell Phone Radiation: Ways to Minimize Harm

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Sun, 30 Jul 2006 23:21:00 +0000

The media is now awash with reports of the potential dangers of cell phone use. It's been linked with a wide range of health problems, such as headaches, dizziness, skin rash, allergies, high blood pressure, brain tumors, Alzheimer's, cancer, etc. You can read some of these reports in our media section: Press Reports on EMF

You may or may not be experiencing any symptoms, but experts like Dr. George Carlo urge extreme caution. Dr. Carlo is the former head of cell phone safety research and he warns that we are on the verge of a health crisis of epidemic proportions. You can watch or listen to his interviews here: Dr. George Carlo interviews

Here are a few things that anyone can and must do in order to reduce any potential harmful effects from cell phone radiation: 10 Cell Phone Radiation Protection Tips.

EMF and Mercury Poisoning

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:24:00 +0000

According to one study, EMF exposure more than doubled the mercury release from dental amalgam. Dental amalgam consists of 50% mercury combined with silver, tin and copper. While the research was conducted using amalgam blocks exposed to computer screens, it is suggested that other devices, such as cell phones, where some of the radio waves go through the head, has the same effect on the dissolution of mercury from amalgam. You can read more details of this intriguing study here: Is Your Computer Releasing Mercury?

A separate but related article finds a connection between electrosensitivity and mercury from dental amalgams. Mercury fillings act like microantennae, and when the user is exposed to EMF, alterations occur in the electric currents in the mouth (electrogalvanism) that has been shown to accelerate the mercury release from fillings. It is also possible that the electrogalvanism thereby interacts with flora in the mouth to produce mercury aggravated infections.

The report mentions Vit. B12 and PABA (Para-amino-benzoic-acid) as helping with the electrosensitivity. And, of course, removal of the dental metals. You can find out more by reading this article: Health Effects of EMF Exposure and Mercury Poisoning

Mercury is considered to be a neurotoxin, and dental mercury has been a subject of intense controversy for a number of years. Dental mercury has been identified as a source of two-thirds of mercury in the human population. It has been linked to impaired kidney function, adverse neurological effects, infertility, Alzheimer's disease, and others.

The EMF-Mercury connection underscores the difficulty in establishing a direct correlation between EMF exposure and any specific disease. Obviously in this case, someone who has dental mercury in their mouth would be more susceptible to health problems associated with increased mercury levels caused by EMF exposure than somebody who doesn't. Experts are suggesting that EMF is more of a 'promoter' that creates a condition for other factors (e.g. environmental toxins and carcinogens) to exploit and cause damage.

Cordless Phones More Dangerous than Cell Phones

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:44:00 +0000

With all the attention focused on the health dangers of cell phone radiation, a lot of people don't realize that using cordless phones pose the same risks as well. Most cordless phones nowadays work on either 900 MHz or 2.4 GHz (= 2400 MHz), well within the microwave frequency range--just like the cell phone.

Now a group of researchers in Sweden are saying that "having a cordless phone in your house can be 100 times more of a health risk than using a mobile," and is more likely to cause brain tumors than a cell phone. This is because the cordless base station acts like a mobile mast inside your home, and the radiation doesn't drop to a safe level until you're at least 100 meters (328 feet) away. The worse part is that the charger emits the radiation at full strength even when the phone is not in use!

If you use a cordless phone in your home, experts recommend that you put the phone in an area that you do not use all the time--such as a foyer or entrance. If it's not possible to keep a safe distance (100 meters or 328 feet), we highly recommend applying the EMF Harmonization Chips right away (one on the base station and one on the phone itself). You can also have additional protection by using the Home Harmonizer, which when plugged in to the wall creates a standing wave of harmonized energies within a 60-ft radius.

To learn more about the Swedish research, read the news article New Cordless Phones Danger.

CNN: Cancer Fear Curbs College's Wi-Fi

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Sun, 26 Feb 2006 01:03:00 +0000

TORONTO, Ontario (Reuters) -- A small Canadian university has ruled out campus-wide wireless Internet access because its president fears the system's electromagnetic forces could pose a risk to students' health.

Lakehead University, in Thunder Bay, Ontario, has only a limited Wi-Fi connections at present, in places where there is no fiber-optic Internet connection. And that, according to president Fred Gilbert, is just fine.

"The jury is still out on the impact that electromagnetic forces have on human physiology," Gilbert told a university meeting last month, insisting that university policy would not change while he remained president.

"Some studies have indicated that there are links to carcinogenetic occurrences in animals, including humans, that are related to energy fields associated with wireless hotspots, whether those hotspots are transmissions lines, whether they're outlets, plasma screens, or microwave ovens that leak."

Lakehead University published a transcript of Gilbert's remarks on its Web site. Spokeswoman Eleanor Abaya said the decision not to expand the university's few isolated wireless networks was a "personal decision" by Gilbert.....

Click here to read the full story

--------------

Comments: Wi-Fi or wireless networks are sprouting everywhere nowadays and is yet another example of how the human population exposure to EMF is growing at an exponential rate. And you don't have to be using the computer to be exposed to the radiation, either. As in 'second hand' cell phone radiation, you only have to be in the vicinity of a wireless 'hotspot' to be affected. This is one big reason for a personal EMF protection like the BIOPRO QLink. The QLink forms a virtual 'bioshield' and strengthens your resistance from stress induced by EMF anywhere you go. It is a MUST for anyone living in today's technological world.

12 Cell Phone Radiation Facts You Should Know

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:24:00 +0000

1. In Australia the number one disease among children is brain tumor and brain cancer… It just surpassed Leukemia.

2. Sperm count in adult males who use cell phones heavily are lowered by as much as 30%.

3. In Japan you aren’t allowed to use Cell Phones on the train due to 2nd hand radiation.

4. In England it is recommended that teenagers 16 and under refrain from unnecessary cell phone use.

5. None of the cell phone companies are insured … they are all self insured. Insurance companies have exclusion clauses against paying compensation for illnesses caused by continuous long-term low level radiation.

6. There are, at the moment, 7 state class action lawsuits, 10 brain cancer lawsuits, 2 workman’s comp lawsuits in California.

7. In new Verizon contracts in fine print -- upon signing the contract you agree not to sue the Cell Phone Maker or participate in a Class Action Lawsuit.

8. With 500 minutes of cell phone use per month you have a 300% increased probability of getting brain cancer.

9. There are 40,000 to 50,000 new cases of brain tumors and eye cancer per year attributed to cell phone use.

10. The average kid uses a cell phone 2600 minutes per month.

11. If the current trend continues there will be 500,000 new cases of tumors per year by the year 2010.

12. Disney Corporation, who 5 years ago turned down $2 million per year licensing fee for use of Disney Characters due to cell phone radiation safety concerns, recently signed a 2 billion contract with Sprint.

Register Your Cell Phone Related Health Problems

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Tue, 17 Jan 2006 04:37:00 +0000

Have you ever experienced any symptoms that you feel are related to your cell phone use? If so, you can register online with the Mobile Telephone Health Concerns Registry. The Registry was created by Dr. George Carlo, the former chief scientist of the cell phone research project funded by the industry. Operating under Dr. Carlo's nonprofit Science and Public Policy Institute, the Registry collects information voluntarily provided by cell phone users and is the first step in consumer protection and public health intervention, and will help direct future research of potential health effects related to cell phone use. Participation in the Registry is strictly confidential. To find out more, go to Mobile Telephone Health Concerns Registry now.

Dr. George Carlo Radio Interview: "Your Cell Phone is Dangerous"

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:57:00 +0000

Dr. George Carlo is known as the epidemiologist and public health scientist who headed the multimillion dollar research funded by the cell phone industry. The project was launched in 1993 as part of a deal made with Congress to keep the industry from being regulated. After six years, Dr. Carlo's research yielded alarming findings that linked cell phone radiation to serious health diseases, including cancer. When he submitted his results to the industry executives, he expected that they would do something about it. Instead, they distanced themselves from him and tried to find ways to discredit his research and reputation.

Dr. Carlo has appeared on 20/20, 60 Minutes, World News Tonight, CBS News with Dan Rather and The Today's Show, as well as on CNN, Fox News, and MSNBC. In July 2006, a documentary film of his work will be released in major theaters.

In this candid interview, Dr. Carlo disclosed not only his research findings that question the safety of cell phone use but also the industry politics and shenanigans that keep cell phones in the market with minimal government intervention. There is no more qualified person to talk about the dangers of cell phone use than the man who headed a multimillion dollar research program into its safety--a program funded by the cell phone industry itself. It took a lot of courage (and still does) for him to go against the corporate giants and risk his career, reputation and even physical safety. This is one interview you do not want to miss! Listen now

Cell Phone Radiation May Trigger Allergies

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Sat, 24 Dec 2005 00:39:00 +0000

Bothered by skin rashes and sensitivity to dust mites and pollen? A two-year old study suggested you cell phone use may be to blame.

Japanese researchers believe that cell phone radiation can 'excite' antigens - substances which cause allergies - in the bloodstreams of people who already suffer from allergies. They found that cell phone users experience an increase in skin rashes or allergic reactions to dust mites and pollen.

Dr Hajime Kimata from Unitika Hospital, Kyoto, carried out research on 52 people with a history of eczema and dermatitis. Half were exposed to cell phone radiation for an hour, while the others were not.

Dr. Kimata, whose findings are published in the medical journal International Archives of Allergy and Immunology, said: "When we did blood tests we found that the mobile phones had raised the levels of certain chemicals in the blood which provoke allergic reactions such as eczema, hay fever and asthma.

"We were surprised but we carried out a properly controlled study. One group of patients had their phones turned on and receiving for an hour while they watched a video. The second group watched the same video while having their phones turned off so they couldn't receive calls.

"There was a significant increase in allergy levels which seemed to be linked to the use of mobile phones." Cell phone use also appeared to worsen skin weals induced by exposure to house dust mites or pollen from cedar trees in the susceptible patients, Dr Kimata reported.

You can read more details about the study here.

In a related report by Daily Mall in London, some cell phone users have also complained that their phones appear to be either causing eczema or making it worse. Neil Warner, 38, a building company manager, said: "I have suffered from eczema for years. When I use the mobile for any length of time I notice it starts to bring out eczema on different parts of my body.

"My skin will get red and sore in various places, but particularly close to where I was using the handset. I've always had eczema on the ears and when I used the phone it seemed to make it worse."

Electrosensitivity a Growing Issue

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Sun, 20 Nov 2005 09:32:00 +0000

Here's an excellent article on electrohypersensitivty, or ES, an allergic reaction to electrical and magnetic frequencies emitted by cell phones, wireless devices, computers, and other electrical equipment and appliances. People who have this condition suffer symptoms that include headaches, nausea, fatigue, loss of memory, muscle pain, insomnia, blurred vision, skin problems and others. At least one expert suggests an association between ES and multiple sclerosis and diabetes.

An estimated 35 percent of the population suffer from a moderate form of ES, with 2 percent exhibiting the extreme cases.

So far, Sweden is the only country to have recognized this seriously as a medical condition. The UK is now following suit. The medical community in the U.S., Canada, and other countries still regard it as psychological nonsense.

This article is by Tyler Hamilton of The Toronto Star, who wrote a series of investigative reports on the cell phone issue this past summer. Read it now: Distress Signals

Cell Phone Radiation Lawsuits Move Forward

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Thu, 10 Nov 2005 00:42:00 +0000

The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal by cell phone manufacturers who've launched efforts to stop five lawsuits from going to court. Five class-action lawsuits were filed in state courts to seek damages, but were dismissed by a U.S. District court judge. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit overturned that decision and reinstated the cases. The cell phone manufacturers argue that their compliance with FCC requirements for cell phone radiation preempts any state regulations. The high court's decision means that one lawsuit will proceed in federal court while the other four will go forward in state court. You can read the full report here: Lawsuits Over Cell Phone Radiation to Continue

The FCC safety limits are being called into question by some scientists, as studies have shown that low intensity radiation up to 200,000 times lower than existing safety standards produces biological effects.

Court Awards Cell Phone Injury Claims

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Sun, 16 Oct 2005 00:46:00 +0000

The sign of things to come? An administrative law judge who handles worker's compensation claims granted court victory to a woman who suffered a brain tumor as a result of her job. The woman sued her employer for the claims because she was convinced her illness had to do with her exposure to radio frequency while working in her job programming cell phones for customers. The settlement awarded was small, enough to pay her medical bills and expenses, but it may be the first time a court has acknowledged evidence of an illness being caused by radio frequency radiation. Fascinating development for sure. Read the article, Court Victory is a First for Cell-phone Programmers.

Cell Phone "Safe" SAR Rating Needs Review

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Fri, 14 Oct 2005 05:36:00 +0000

If you own a cell phone, you may or may not have heard of SAR (Specific Absorption Rate). SAR is a measure of the amount of radio frequency energy absorbed by the body when using a mobile phone. In the US, cell phone manufacturers are required by the FCC to make sure their cell phones do not exceed the "safe" level of 1.6 watts per kilogram (1.6 W/kg).

But several studies are showing that low-intensity radiation up to 200,000 times BELOW the safety standard cause biological effects. These include: DNA damage, leakage in the blood-brain barrier, lowered immunity, formation of micronuclei (biological marker for cancer), and others. Some scientists are calling for a new standard as the SAR measure proves to be inadequate. Read the article, Cell Phone Safety Standards Not Good Enough

Are You Electrosensitive?

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Sat, 01 Oct 2005 09:14:00 +0000

If you are, it's not 'just in your head.'That's the conclusion made by a British government agency who acknowledged that electrosensitivity, a heightened reaction to electrical energy, is a physical, rather than a psychological, ailment. This action follows Sweden who has long recognised electrosensitivity as a physical impairment since 2000. (Not so in the USA, where it is still ignored by mainstream medicine.)

When exposed to electromagnetic fields, people who have this condition suffer symptoms that include nausea, irregular heartbeat, fatigue, loss of memory, headaches, dizzines, muscle pains, skin problems, etc. In Sweden people who are allergic to electrical energy receive government support to reduce exposure in their homes and workplaces.

This is a very important development. It is an official acknowledgement that electropollution is not a hype but a real problem.

Here's great quote from Olle Johansson, associate professor of neuroscience at the Karolinska Institute in Sweden: "If you put a radio near a source of EMFs you will get interference. The human brain has an electric field so if you put sources of EMFs nearby, it is not surprising that you get interference, interaction with systems and damage to cells and molecules."

Well, I don't think you can get a plainer and simpler explanation than that. Read the report, Electrical Fields Can Make You Sick.

New Site Map

noreply@blogger.com (Taraka) — Mon, 26 Sep 2005 01:59:00 +0000

Just updated the website recently to include a site map. While our site navigation is usually sufficient to locate specific information on this site, the site map lists in one page links to all our pages of information. Especially helpful in locating a specific page to revisit.