Home > Pressroom
Main > Press
Reports on EMF >
Press Reports on EMF
The Cell Phone Industry: Big Tobacco 2.0?
CNET.com, March 8, 2005
by Molly Wood, Senior Editor
there's this incredibly popular product that has widespread
consumer use and a massive marketing presence. Nearly everyone
uses it, and it has very high social acceptance, even though
some people find it annoying when it's used in public. It's
highly habit-forming; people who use the product on a regular
basis find it almost impossible to live without.
Unfortunately, studies start to appear showing that the
product might be harmful to its users--even cancer-causing.
The product's manufacturers deny the presence of any danger
and even spend millions of dollars trying to discredit the
research that points to problems. Then, an insider emerges,
seemingly with proof that the product could be dangerous.
The industry agrees to publish warning data about the product,
but continues to maintain that the product itself is safe
for use. Lawsuits against the product's manufacturers are
filed, but all are dismissed. Industry analysts know that
any case that does succeed could start a domino effect of
future lawsuits, which keeps the industry determined to
maintain that the product is harmless, despite increasing
evidence to the contrary.
Well, put down your lighter, I'm talking about cell phones.
I've already maintained that I don't like the cell phone
industry's iron-clad control over phone releases and pricing,
its ever-lengthening contracts, and the annoying habit it
has of crippling Bluetooth phones so that I can't use them
the way I want to. But it takes only a few minutes of looking
into the cell phone radiation quagmire before I start to
think, man, these guys have Big Tobacco 2.0 written all
over them. Actually, I'm not the first to think of it, but
a recent article in the University of Washington alumni
magazine indicates that the behaviors aren't going away,
even as the potentially damning research continues to mount.
OK, I know the obvious differences: I'm sure cell phone
manufacturers are not deliberately making their products
more addictive, for example--although they are, of course,
always offering new and improved services and ever-increasing
buckets of minutes, which can't help but encourage us to
use our phones more and more frequently. But, just as Big
Tobacco did, the cell phone industry seems bound and determined
to thwart and deny any suggestion that its product might
A history of bad
For example, in 1994, University of Washington bioengineering professors
Henry Lai and Narendra Singh found that the DNA in rats' brains was damaged
after two hours of exposure to levels of microwave radiation considered
safe by the government. When Lai and Singh published the research, a leaked
memo from Motorola's head of global strategy, Norm Sandler, talked about
ways to minimize damage by undermining their research, with Sandler writing,
"I think that we have sufficiently war-gamed the Lai/Singh issue." Ouch.
Worse, research biologist Jerry Phillips, who was paid by Motorola to
conduct similar testing, says he was able to duplicate Lai and Singh's
findings, but was then asked not to publish the research and was subsequently
shunned by the company. Motorola says it told Phillips that his findings
needed clarification, and the industry still maintains that Lai and Singh's
results have never been duplicated and can't be considered legitimate.
The biggest Russell Crowe-style insider in this case, though,
is Dr. George Carlo, who was hired by the Cellular Telecommunications
& Internet Association to head up a $28 million research
program into possible health effects from cellular phones.
Unfortunately, he now says his findings show an increased
rate of brain cancer deaths, development of tumors, and
genetic damage among heavy cell phone users. He wrote this
letter of concern to the president of AT&T Corporation and
later went public with his findings after what he considered
to be neglect by the industry. He's since broken with the
industry, become a vocal critic, and coauthored a book called
Phones: Invisible Hazards in the Wireless Age--so
you can tell he's on the "cell phones could cause cancer"
side of things.
Meanwhile, more studies keep coming, and they seem to be getting worse.
A study funded by the European Union reported last December that radio
waves from mobile phones do, definitively, damage DNA and other cells
in the body--and that the damage extended to the next generation of cells.
Even though mutated cells are considered a possible cause of cancer, the
UK National Radiological Protection Board said that since the study
didn't show that the damage definitely led to disease, consumers shouldn't
worry too much about the findings.
Uh, right. In the meantime, the report recommended that
children use mobile phones only in emergency situations.
You know, just in case. How reassuring.
The cell phone industry hasn't commissioned another large-scale study--at
least not publicly--since its fateful encounter with Dr. Carlo--and why
would they? They're in a catch-22. It's a multibillion dollar industry,
and they simply can't afford to find out, definitively, that cell phones
are dangerous. Worse, just like the tobacco companies, if they start issuing
warnings and precautionary tales now, it'll look like they knew all along
that the radio waves were dangerous, opening them up to major liability
claims. They've already dodged one big, big bullet--an $800 million lawsuit
against Motorola and cell phone carriers was thrown out in 2002, with
the judge ruling that there wasn't sufficient evidence for trial. Since
then, neurologist Dr. Christopher Newman, who filed the lawsuit, has died
of brain cancer.
Listen, I use a cell phone, and I'm not trying to scare the bejesus out
of everyone. But I do use a headset when
I'm talking for any long period of time, and I carry that sucker in my
purse, not my pocket. (I know you guys don't have that luxury, but reconsider
the briefcase, OK?) And if you're shopping for a new phone, you might
want to check our cell phone radiation chart to see which ones carry a
In a few more years, we'll either know for sure that cell
phones can cause cancer, or we'll know they can't. I just
hope we don't find out the hard way--through subpoenaed
documents from cell phone makers and carriers who've been
trying to minimize their damages and maximize their profits
for more than a decade.
Personal EMF & Stress Protection 24/7
Try any of our QLink products
for 3 months, absolutely RISK-FREE.
If you do not feel Q-Link® improves your focus,
energy, or well-being, simply return it for a full
Protection for the Entire Home
Do you live near phone masts or hi-tension power lines?
Concerned about the EMF effects from your home's electrical
EarthCalm® Home Protection System for 90 days